High Court Bench at Aurangabad dismissed consolidated Writ Petitions filed by Raghavendra Shrinivasrao Deshpande following an earlier coordinate Bench decision finding no cause to interdict the inquiry.
Writ Petitions dismissed with liberty to petitioners as per order dated 28.09.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917WP200.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 200 OF 2021
WITH WP/209/2021 WITH WP/213/2021
WITH WP/216/2021 WITH WP/247/2021
Raghavendra Shrinivasrao Deshpande
….Petitioner
Versus
Matoshri Pratishthan Through Its President/
Secretary and Others….Respondents
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Gaikwad h/f. Mr. A.G. Talhar
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. R.B. Narwade-Patil
Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. N.U. Telegaonkar
Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mrs. Anjali Dube (Bajpai)
Advocate for Respondent No. 4 in WP/213/21 : Mr. P.P. Uttarwar
Advocate for Respondent No. 4 in WP/216/21 : Mr. S.S. Shinde
AGP for Respondent No. 6 : Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI & S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 01.02.2022
P.C. :-
1. The issues involved in the present petitions, including the question
of law, have been decided by the co-ordinate Bench presided over by the Hon’ble Chief Justice in Writ Petition Nos. 217/2021 and 240/2021,by its order dated 28.09.2021. The reasoning given in the said order
dated 28.09.2021, is mutatis mutandis applicable to the present
group of petitions as the petitioners are similarly situated and
917WP200.21
- 2 -
governed by the same provisions of law.
There is a consensus amongst all the learned counsel appearing
for the respective parties that, the decision rendered by the co-ordinate
Bench in Writ Petition Nos. 217/2021 and 240/2021, squarely applies
to the present cases.
2.In view thereof and by following the decision in Writ Petition
Nos. 217/2021 and 240/2021, we find that, there is no valid reason to
interdict with the inquiry.
3.Writ Petitions are accordingly dismissed with liberty to the
petitioners as noted in the order dated 28.09.2021.
4.Needless to observe that, the Presiding Officer of the Tribunal will
proceed to decide the appeals pending before him without being
influenced by dismissal of these Writ Petitions.
( S. G. MEHARE, J. ) ( A.S. Gadkari, J. )
SPC
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petitions should be allowed to interdict with the inquiry.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
co-ordinate Bench order dated 28.09.2021Followed¶20
Writ Petition Nos. 217/2021 and 240/2021
Raghavendra Shrinivasrao Deshpande
Matoshri Pratishthan
A.S. Gadkari
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court