The High Court continued an interim stay on the execution of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights for six weeks, accepting the petitioner's undertaking to conclude arguments on a delay application within four weeks.
Continued the interim stay on execution for a period of six weeks from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by IRESH IRESH SIDDHARAM SIDDHARAM MASHAL MASHAL Date: 2022.03.09 14:29:12+0530
7.210.20 wp.doc
ISM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 210 OF 2020
TILOTTAMA SWAPNIL LAMKANE ….PETITIONER
V/s.
SWAPNIL UTTAMKUMAR LAMKANE …..RESPONDENT
Mr. Vishwanath S. Talkute Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Milind Prabhune i/b Sarang S. Aradhye for Respondent no. 1
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE: MARCH 8, 2022.
P.C.:
in Civil Misc. Application No. 134 of 2019 by learned District Judge-1, Pandharpur wherein interim relief granted in favour of the Petitioner came to be vacated as the Petitioner has not cooperated in expeditious disposal of the matter.
which was subject matter of challenge in Appeal which was
1/3
7.210.20 wp.doc
accompanied with Application for condonation of delay as Appeal was delayed by 5 months and 27 days.
not cooperating in expeditious disposal of the Appellate proceedings.
2/3
7.210.20 wp.doc
According to him, Petition is liable to be dismissed.
continued the interim in favour of the Petitioner and same is in operation for last two years in the present petition and before that for about three months in the Appeal.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to continue the interim stay on execution of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights pending conclusion of arguments on condonation of delay.
Whether the petitioner's undertaking to conclude arguments within four weeks justifies a temporary extension of stay.
Tilottama Swapnil Lamkane
Swapnil Uttamkumar Lamkane
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
