Petitioners challenged rejection of their objections for voter list inclusion. The court relied on a Division Bench judgment finding alternate remedy under the Co-operative Societies Act available and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp2025-22
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2025 OF 2022
Balaji Vilasrao Shinde and Others
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others
RESPONDENTS
Mr. Shahaji B. Ghatol-Patil, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for respondent - State Mr. V. H. Dighe, Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 7
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
DATE : 10th FEBRUARY, 2022
ORDER :
{2} wp2025-22
Societies, Pune and Others) submitted that in view of availability of the alternate remedy, the writ petition may not be entertained.
[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE
drp/wp2025-22
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the rejection of objections for inclusion in voters list is maintainable when an alternate remedy is available under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dattatray Genaba Lole and Others V/s The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Pune and OthersRelied on¶16
Writ Petition No. 5878 of 2021 (Dattatray Genaba Lole and Others V/s The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Pune and Others)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Balaji Vilasrao Shinde and Others
The State of Maharashtra and Others
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
