The petition was disposed of on consent terms. The court accepted the undertakings in the consent terms signed by the parties and permitted the disposal of the writ petition accordingly.
Disposal of the writ petition in terms of the consent terms accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ANANT Digitally signedby ANANT KRISHNA KRISHNA NAIK NAIK Date: 2022.01.0712:26:53 +0530
1/2
2.WP.1874.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1874 OF 2016
Umakant Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Anr. Versus MCGM & Ors.
..Petitioners
...Respondents.
Ms Kausar Banatwala i/b. Tushar Goradia for the Petitioners. Ms Mansi Shah i/b. M/s Pravin Mehta and Mithi & Co for the Respondent No. 5 Mr. Amit Shastri, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ
DATED : 05th JANUARY, 2022 (Through VC)
P.C.:
By consent, we permit the Petitioners to delete the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 as party Respondents. By consent, we also permit the Petitioners to add the name of K. Mehta & Co. as party Respondent No. 5. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Reverification is dispensed with.
1/2
AKN
2/2
2.WP.1874.2016.doc
Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X”. The Undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(A. A. SAYED, J.)
2/2
AKN
Umakant Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
MCGM
A. A. SAYED
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
