The court disposed of Criminal Writ Petition No. 176 of 2021 as infructuous because a paragraph in the reply of respondent no. 3 answered the petitioner's prayer, rendering further proceedings unnecessary.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
1306wp176.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.176 OF 2021
(Abdul Raheman Abdul Bashir vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri N.M. Kolhe, Advocate (appointed) for
petitioner.
Ms. N.R. Tripathi, Additional Public Prosecutor for
respondents.
CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
G.A. SANAP, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 13, 2022
Heard learned Counsel for the parties and
perused the reply of the respondent no.3.
2)What is stated in paragraph 7 of the reply
of the respondent no.3 answers the prayer of the
petitioner and, therefore, now the petition has been
rendered infructuous. The petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
3)Legal remuneration of rupees five
thousand be paid to the learned Counsel appointed
for the petitioner.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Digitally Signed By:Kamal Jeswani Signing Date:14.06.2022 15:21
khj
Abdul Raheman Abdul Bashir
The State of Maharashtra
others
Sunil B. Shukre
G.A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court