Allowed

Vikram Baburao Bhosale and Others v. Shivaji Baburao Shinde and Others

Bombay HC3 Feb 2022WP/1663/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a writ petition and quashed an order refusing permission to lead evidence as a violation of natural justice. Petitioners were directed to lead evidence before the Deputy Charity Commissioner and proceedings were remanded to be decided on merits within six months.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders quashed; directions issued for petitioners to lead evidence before Deputy Charity Commissioner on 14/02/2022 and decide inquiry within six months.

Vikram Baburao Bhosale and Others Vs Shivaji Baburao… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1 926-WP-1663-2022.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.1663 OF 2022

¶4

VIKRAM BABURAO BHOSALE AND OTHERS

¶5

VERSUS
SHIVAJI BABURAO SHINDE AND OTHERS

¶6

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Narwadkar Mrigesh D.
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. S. W. Munde
Advocate for Respondent No.1: Mr. N. L. Jadhav h/f Mr. R. C.
Bramhankar

¶7

 CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.

¶8

 DATE : 3rd February, 2022

¶9

PER COURT :

¶10

. This petition impugns the order dated 13/12/2021 passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Beed/respondent No.5 below Exhibit-178 in Inquiry No.1638/2018, thereby refusing permission to the petitioners herein to lead evidence.

¶11

2. After hearing the rival submissions of the learned advocates’ for

¶12

the petitioners and the respondents, this Court is of the view that, fair
opportunity needs to be given to the petitioners to lead evidence and
they cannot be denied the same. The impugned order since is passed
in violation of principle of natural justice, writ petition is allowed in

¶13

2 926-WP-1663-2022.odt

¶14

terms of prayer clause ‘C’. The impugned orders passed below
Exhibit-162 and Exhibit-178 are hereby quashed and set aside.

¶15

3.The petitioners are directed to lead evidence before the Deputy
Charity Commissioner, Beed/respondent No.5 on the next date i.e.
14/02/2022. The proceedings i.e. Inquiry No.1638/2018 shall be
decided, on its own merits, within a period of six months from today.

¶16

4. With these directions, writ petition is disposed of.

¶17

 (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)

¶18

Sameer

Vikram Baburao Bhosale and Others v. Shivaji Baburao Shinde and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Baburao Bhosale and Others v. Shivaji Baburao Shinde and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satwa Rangrao Kale Vs Jankiram Pralhad Shinde

Bibishan Sandipan Ghuge Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Girna Vidya Prasarak Mandal Mehunbare the Registered Public Trust Thr Its Secretary Vs the Tahasildar and Another

Suryakant Bhagwan Bachate and Others Vs Ankita Amol Bachate U/G of Natural Mothers Smt Sarika Amol Bachate Nd Another

Kisan Vishnu Vaidya Vs Mankawati Bhimrao Vaidya and OTHERS12

Prabhakar Maruti Salunke Vs Haribhau Maruti Salunke