Disposed
Shanta Narayanrao Vaidya and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/14893/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
906 WRIT PETITION NO.14893 OF 2021
SHANTA NARAYANRAO VAIDYA AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Bhosale Sanjay B
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. S. G. Karlekar
CORAM: A.S. GADKARI & S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 16th February, 2022
ORDER:
Learned AGP, on instructions, submitted that, respondent No.3- Deputy Director, Vocational Education & Training, Aurangabad,will decide representation of the petitioner dated 14.08.2018 within a
period of four months from the date of receipt of present Order, if not
decided earlier to it.
2. Said statement is accepted.
3. Petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.
( S. G. MEHARE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
JPC
Page 1 of 1
SHANTA NARAYANRAO VAIDYA AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
A.S. GADKARI
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court