The High Court rejected a writ petition seeking a direction to the Respondent-Tahsildar to expedite a revenue enquiry. The Court held that gross failure was not established.
Petitioner was not directed to speed-up the enquiry and Writ Petition was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 19-WP-1433-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1433 OF 2022
Shri Manoj s/o Kisanlal Kariya -- Petitioner/s
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. -- Respondent/s
Mr. Manoj Kariya, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.A. Madiwale, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &
ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATE : 16 MARCH 2022
P. C. :
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
SUMIT
2 / 2 19-WP-1433-2022
isolation, as Section 11 of the Act makes the provision of Section 10 of the Act inapplicable to certain matters such as quasi judicial matters.
Digitally signed bySUMIT CHETAN AGRAWAL Signing Date:22.03.2022 17:31
SUMIT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued to direct a Tahsildar to expedite a revenue enquiry into a sale-deed objection.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Manoj Kariya
State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
