Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition based on a settlement with the respondents. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44-crwp1427-2022.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1427 OF 2022
Kunal Behari Valecha
…Petitioner
V/s.
Lavina Kunal Valecha (Alias
Lavina Jagdish Mahnubani) & Anr.
…Respondents
Ms. Surabhi S. Agrawal i/by Mr. Shirin Merchant for
the petitioner.
Ms. Renuka A. Birajdar i/by Mr. Ketan V. Joshi for
respondent no.1.
Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for the respondent no.2/State.
Digitally signed by ATUL ATUL GANESH GANESH KULKARNI KULKARNI Date: 2022.11.14 14:54:06 +0530
CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:NOVEMBER 11, 2022
P.C.:
1.Learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, states
that in view of settlement between the parties, the petitioner does
not wish to prosecute the petition and, hence, she be allowed to
withdraw the petition.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Kunal Behari Valecha
Lavina Kunal Valecha (Alias Lavina Jagdish Mahnubani) & Anr.
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court