Trimbak Pandharinath Thombre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

of the Magistrate under section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 611 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kaij, District – Beed. The application was filed on 12-11-2020 and still has not been decided. He is seeking a direction to the trial Court to decide that application.

¶11

Considering the fact that the application was filed way back on 12-11-2020 and even there is an endorsement by the then Magistrate on 21-11-2020 directing the matter to be placed for

¶12

2 Cr. WP / 1426 / 2022

¶13

arguments, we are surprised to note that the Magistrate has taken this much of time for deciding that application.

¶14

We, therefore, allow the writ petition and direct the learned Magistrate to decide the petitioner’s application as early as possible and in any event within four weeks from the date of receipt of writ.

¶15

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE

¶16

arp/

Trimbak Pandharinath Thombre v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Trimbak Pandharinath Thombre v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Ismail Noor Mohd. Madna Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sunil Rajaram Manndavkar (C-5245) Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vivek Buddhinath Mishra Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others