Allowed

Mohd. Imran Ansari Thr. His Legal Guardian Mohd. Shafique Ansari v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Khapa Tehsil Tq.Saoner and Dist.Nagpur (Rural) Mah.

Bombay HC6 Jun 2022WP/135/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court held that a 17-year-old petitioner was a juvenile in conflict with law and directed police to produce him before the Juvenile Justice Board within three days for consideration of bail.

What did the court decide?

Direction to produce the petitioner before the Juvenile Justice Board within three days and to deal with him according to law.

Mohd. Imran Ansari Thr. His Legal Guardian… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Bombay HC (2022)

Judgment

wp135.22 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶5

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.135 OF 2022

¶6

Mohd.Imran Ansari,
Aged about : 17 years,
Through his legal guardian
Mohd.Shafique Ansari,
Aged about 38 years, occupation : Nil,
R/o 605, Sangharsh Nagar, Pili Nadi,
Uppalwadi, Nagpur, Maharashtra – 440 026. ….. Petitioner.

¶7

:: V E R S U S ::

¶8

State of Maharashtra,
Through PSO, Khapa Police Station
Tahsil, Taluka Saoner and District Nagpur
(Rural) Maharashtra – 44 1 107. ….. Respondent.

¶9

===================================

¶10

Ms G.W.Sambare, Counsel for the Petitioner.
Shri I.J.Damle, Addl.P.P. for the State.

¶11

===================================

¶12

CORAM : SUNIL B.SHUKRE & G.A.SANAP, JJ.
DATE: JUNE 06, 2022

¶13

ORAL JUDGMENT(Per : Sunil B.Shukre, J.)

¶14

1. Heard learned counsel Ms G.W.Sambare for the petitioner

¶15

and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri I.J.Damle for the State.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of

¶16

learned counsel for parties.

¶17

2. On going through the report of the Juvenile Justice Board,
Nagpur dated 17.5.2022, it becomes clear that on the date of the offence
the petitioner was 17 years, two months, and one day old and thus a

.....2/-

Judgment

wp135.22 2

juvenile is in conflict with law. This Court makes it clear to the
Investigating Officer to immediately produce the petitioner before the
Juvenile Justice Board, Nagpur for being dealt with in accordance with
law, including his release on bail on suitable conditions.

¶23

3. Accordingly, we direct Khapa Police Station, Nagpur to
produce the petitioner before the Juvenile Justice Board, Nagpur within a
period of three days from the date of the order of this Court and upon
such production, the Juvenile Justice Board, Nagpur shall deal with the
petitioner as a juvenile in conflict with law in accordance with law
including considering his release on suitable conditions.

¶24

Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms. No costs.

¶25

4. Authenticate copy of this order be furnished to learned

¶26

counsel for both parties to be acted upon.

¶27

JUDGE JUDGE

¶28

Digitally !! BRW !! signed by BHUSHAN BHUSHAN RANA RANA WANKHEDE WANKHEDE Date: 2022.06.06 18:26:47 +0530

¶29

...../-

Mohd. Imran Ansari Thr. His Legal Guardian Mohd. Shafique Ansari v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Khapa Tehsil Tq.Saoner and Dist.Nagpur (Rural) Mah.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Imran Ansari Thr. His Legal Guardian Mohd. Shafique Ansari v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Khapa Tehsil Tq.Saoner and Dist.Nagpur (Rural) Mah.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gautam Navlakha Vs National Investigation Agency and Anr..

Dr. P. Varavara Rao Vs National Investigation Agency and Anr.

Sheetal Madhukar Kondhalkar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Dpet of Education and Ors.

Prof. Anand S/O Narayanrao Poharkar and Anr. Vs Lokmat Newspaper Charitable Trust and Ors.

Sanket Waman Dhanorkar and Another Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Warora Tqwarora Distchandrapur and Another

Prof. Anand S/O Narayanrao Poharkar and Anr. Vs Lokmat Newspaper Charitable Trust and Ors.