The Bombay HC dismissed a writ petition challenging an order permitting a respondent to withdraw challenged rent. The court found no error in the lower court's findings regarding the applicability of the Maharashtra Slum Act and held that withdrawal remains subject to the appeal's final outcome.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21 wp13455-2022.doc
1/2
HRN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13455 OF 2022
Mr. Hemant Ramanlal Merai ...Petitioner Versus Harbhajan Singh B. Ajimal ...Respondent
...Respondent
Mr.Ranjeev Carvalho a/w.Dikshak Soni i/by Mohanish Ghatge, for the Petitioner.
Respondent-in-person present.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2022
P.C.:
Appellate Court has recorded a finding that the issue of the suit
21 wp13455-2022.doc
2/2
HRN
property being covered under the Maharashtra Slum Act was never raised before the Trial Court and it is first time sought to be canvassed in the appeal and rejected the objection of the petitioner. As far as said findings are concerned, I hardly see any error in recording such findings.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the withdrawal of rent amount by the lower court was erroneous given the pending appeal.
Mr. Hemant Ramanlal Merai
Harbhajan Singh B. Ajimal
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
