In Writ Petition No. 1311 of 2022, the Bombay High Court held that the present petition challenging a Delhi Tribunal order must be filed before the Aurangabad Bench. Records are directed to be transmitted there. No merits were decided.
Registry directed to transmit records to the Aurangabad Bench for disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
Digitally signed URMILA by URMILAPRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date:2022.02.25 19:59:47 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1311 OF 2022
Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd... Petitioner Vs.
Mr. Siddharth Suresh Bagul and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Vishwanath Patil a/w Mr. Jay Dongre i/b Mr. Kewal Ahya, for Petitioner. None for Respondents.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 24, 2022
P.C. :
The order under challenge dated November 23, 2021 has been passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad. This writ petition ought to have been moved by the petitioner before the Aurangabad Bench of this Court. Registry is directed to transmit the records to such Bench at the earliest.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition ought to have been filed with the Aurangabad Bench of this High Court instead of Bombay Cabinet.
Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd
Mr. Siddharth Suresh Bagul and ors.
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
