Mohammed Farid Afzal Sarang v. Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur
Case brief
What is this about?
Court rejected Writ Petition on maintainability grounds. Petition filed personally by one importer on behalf of twelve was not entertained in the presented manner. Order strictly procedural.
What the court decided
1 / 1 30-WP-1280-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1280 OF 2022
Mohammed Farid Afzal Sarang -- Petitioner/s
Vs.
Commissioner of Customs -- Respondent/s
Mr. Khatri Mohamed Adil Firoz, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ. DATE : 13 APRIL 2022.
P. C. :
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
- At the outset, the learned Counsel for the Respondent has rightly taken objection that the petition as presented is not maintainable. The petition is presented by one Mohammed Farid Afzal Sarang on behalf of 12 importers but in his own personal capacity. We are not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition in the manner it is presented. As and when proper petition is filed, the same will be taken up for consideration.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohammed Farid Afzal Sarang
- respondent
Commissioner of Customs
Coram
NITIN JAMDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mahila Utkarsha Pratishthan Thr. President, Ms. B.P. Gawali Thr. P.O.A. Holder J. v. Patole and Anr. Vs Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi and Others
Union Bank of India, Nagpur Thr. Auth. Officer, and Cons. Attorney, Shri. a. Murali Krishna Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Finance and Revenue, Mumbai and Others
Vilas Purushottam Bhongale Vs the Chairman Cum Managing Director, Western Coalfields Ltd. Nagpur and Others