The High Court of Bombay disposed of multiple writ petitions and interim applications based on consent minutes signed by the parties. The court confirmed that the advocates represented the parties and accepted the agreed terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
Digitally signed by URMILA URMILAPRAMOD PRAMODINGALEDate: INGALE 2022.06.23 14:33:55 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1263 OF 2002
Shri Krishna Brahmaji Narkar and ors. .. Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1263 OF 2002
Chintaman S. Dalvi and anr. .. Applicants
In the matter between
Shri Krishna Brahmaji Narkar and ors. .. Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 8727 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1263 OF 2002
Shri Krishna Brahmaji Narkar and ors. .. Applicants In the matter between
Shri Krishna Brahmaji Narkar and ors. .. Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 291 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1263 OF 2002
1
Shri Krishna Brahmaji Narkar and ors. .. Applicants In the matter between Shri Krishna Brahmaji Narkar and ors. .. Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 24789 OF 2021 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 291 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1263 OF 2002 (Not on Board)
Lalita Shrikant Haldankar and ors. .. Applicants In the matter between Krishna Brahmaji Narkar and ors. .. Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Atul Damle, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. A.V. Chatuphale, Ms. Sneha Prabhu, Ms. Kinnari Mehta and Ms. Payal, for petitioners in WP/1263/2002 and for applicant in IA(L)/8727/2022 and IA/291/2019.
Mr. Milind More, Addl. Government Pleader a/w Mr. Himanshu B. Takke, AGP for State-respondent nos. 1 to 3 in WP/1263/2002.
Mr. Vaibhav M. Parashurami for respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6. Ms. Rupali Adhate for respondent no. 7 – MCGM. Mr. Dhananjay B. Deshmukh for respondent no. 8. Mr. Nigel Quraishy for respondent nos. 9 to 16.
Mr. Abhijeet A. Joshi a/w Ms. Varsha Sawant, Mr. Namit V. Loya and Mr. Swapnil Jadhav for applicant in IA/19/2022 and for respondent nos. 17, 18 and 19 in WP/1263/2002. Mr. Viral Thaker a/w Mr. Varun Agarwal i/b. LJ Law for applicants in IAL/24789/2021 in IA/291/2019 in
2
WP/1263/2002 (Not on Board).
WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 13104 OF 2022 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 16244 OF 2022
Juni Chikhalwadi Samantar Rahivasi Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (Proposed).. Petitioner vs.
The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Atul Damle, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. A.V. Chatuphale, Ms. Sneha Prabhu, Ms. Kinnari Mehta and Ms. Payal for petitioners in WPL/13104/2022 and for applicant in IAL/16244/2022.
Mr. Milind More, Additional Government Pleader for Staterespondent nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. Vaibhav M. Parashurami for respondent nos. 4 and 5. Mr. Nigel Quraishy for respondent no. 6.
WITH
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 17704 OF 2022
Sanjay Vishwas Rajwadkar and anr. .. Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy a/w Mr. Saikumar Ramamurthy and Ms. Priya Borgaonkar for petitioners.
Mr. Milind More, Additional Government Pleader for Staterespondent nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. Vaibhav M. Parashurami for respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6. Mr. Nigel Quraishy for respondent no. 7. Ms. Rupali Adhate for respondent no. 10-MCGM.
3
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JUNE 21, 2022
P.C. :
4
2002 and advocates for the respondents no. 4 and 5 and on behalf of respondents no. 8 to 16 have duly signed the consent minutes of order. The consent minutes of order are also signed on behalf of the advocate for the petitioners in Writ Petition (L) No. 13104 of 2022 and advocates for respondent no. 4, 5 and 6. Learned advocates who are the signatories to the consent minutes of the order state on instructions that the petitioners and the concerned respondents who they represent will duly abide by the consent minutes of the order. Statement is accepted.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
5
Shri Krishna Brahmaji Narkar and ors.
State of Maharashtra and ors.
Chintaman S. Dalvi and anr.
Lalita Shrikant Haldankar and ors.
Juni Chikhalwadi Samantar Rahivasi Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (Proposed)
Sanjay Vishwas Rajwadkar and anr.
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
