Petitioner Federation withdrew its writ petition to challenge MIDC actions, seeking liberty for individual members to approach the Court.
Liberty granted to individual members of the petitioner Federation to approach this Court in writ jurisdiction regarding the action of the MIDC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
WP No.12326/2021
vd_dhirde
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 12326 OF 2021
Federation of Shendra D.M.I.C. Industries and Agriculture
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
Mr. Ashwin V. Sakolkar, Advocate holding for Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, A. G. P. for respondents – State.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ AND N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2022.
P. C. :
liberty so that individual members of the petitioning Federation can approach this Court in the writ jurisdiction for challenging the action of the M.I.D.C. in their individual capacity.
withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. No costs.
(2)
WP No.12326/2021
3. All contentions are kept open.
(N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Federation of Shendra D.M.I.C. Industries and Agriculture
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
Bandhu Madhavnath Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
