The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn upon granting of leave.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
907 WRIT PETITION NO.12062 OF 2021
MAHENDRA JWALAPRASAD AGRAWAL
VERSUS
RUPESH SURENDRAKUMAR LUNKAD AN OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mrs. Seema Gaikwad (Pawar) h/f.
Mr. Ajay G. Talhar
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 05-12-2022
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seeksleave to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Leave is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
( SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. )
GGP
MAHENDRA JWALAPRASAD AGRAWAL
RUPESH SURENDRAKUMAR LUNKAD
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court