Petitioner challenged the application of a Government Resolution barring untrained teachers from appointment, noting its non-application to him. The court found no basis to initiate proceedings and disposed of the petition.
Writ petition disposed of without initiating any proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 910-WP-1178-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1178 OF 2022
Haridas s/o Sawaji Halami -- Petitioner/s Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. -- Respondent/s
Mr. I.G. Meshram, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N.R. Rode, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ. DATE : 01 MARCH 2022
P. C. :
The Petitioner states that the Petitioner has recently come to know about the Government Resolution dated 09 February 2016, which states that un-trained Teachers should not be appointed. The Petitioner states that though this Resolution is not applicable to the Petitioner, yet the Respondents may rely on the same. The Respondents have not relied upon the same for last six years. The Petitioner has filed this petition on a pure apprehension.
SUMIT
2 / 2 910-WP-1178-2022
Petitioner’s services could be under scrutiny of the Respondent Authorities.
Digitally signed bySUMIT CHETAN AGRAWAL Signing Date:04.03.2022 17:09
SUMIT
Haridas s/o Sawaji Halami
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
