This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-wp-11444-2022.doc
Pallavi
Digitally signed by PALLAVI PALLAVI MAHENDRA MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR WARGAONKAR Date: 2022.09.27 20:30:39 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.11444 OF 2022
Rahul Ashok Gorde and Ors. …Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary Urban Development Dept. and Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Pandit Kasar for the petitioners. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke for respondent no.3.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2022
P.C.:
1. Since the petitioners have been favoured with offer of appointment yesterday, nothing survives for a decision on this writ petition. The same stands disposed of without costs, with liberty to the petitioners to respond to such offer.
2. The appointment letters are marked ‘X’ for identification and shall be retained with the record.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Rahul Ashok Gorde and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
Secretary Urban Development Dept.
Dipankar Datta
Madhav J Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
