The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The court noted that the petitioner's counsel moved for withdrawal based on instructions, and the petition stands dismissed accordingly.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(501)-WP-10840-18 (corrected).doc . Corrected pursuant to speaking to minutes of order dt. 14th July, 2022.
Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJI GOVINDRAOPANCHAL GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date:2022.07.18 16:30:49 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10840 OF 2018 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.10455 OF 2022
M/s. Udaan Construction Company ..Petitioner Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Arjun Kadam, for the Petitioner. Mr. C. D. Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 12th JULY, 2022 P.C.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
BGP. 1 o f 1
M/s. Udaan Construction Company
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
