Writ petitioner sought to withdraw the petition on grounds of being infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
31-WP-10773-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10773 OF 2017
Gauri Satish Musale .. Petitioner v/s. .. The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors Respondents
Mr. Anand S. Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP for Respondent-State.
CORAM: SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 28 NOVEMBER 2022
P. C:-
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous and seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.)
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARISUBODH RAJESHWARISUBODHKARVE KARVE Date: 2022.11.28 18:11:45 +0530
1 of 1
Gauri Satish Musale
The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors
SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
