The High Court of Mumbai dismissed a writ petition as infructuous. No operative findings or legal propositions were articulated by the single-judge bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Arjun
03-WP-10662-14.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10662 OF 2014
Naresh Nanakchand Agarwal & Anr. …Petitioners V/s. Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. S. S. Kanetkar, for the Petitioners. Mr. Ashish S. Gaikwad, for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP, for Respondent No. 1-State.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 10th June, 2022
P.C. :
Petitioners, fairly submits that, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
infructuous.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J)
Naresh Nanakchand Agarwal
Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
