Disposed

Yogita W/O Sachin Hule @ Yogita Balu Adavale and Ors. v. the Union of India Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC25 Nov 2022WP/10266/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple writ petitions were disposed of by the High Court of Bombay, Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The Court held that parties to these petitions are entitled to similar benefits as obtained in Chetan Pramod Gangele vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. before a coordinate Bench at Aurangabad, citing that provisions lead to uniformity.

What did the court decide?

Parties entitled to similar benefits as per the order dated June 20, 2022 passed by a coordinate Bench at Aurangabad Bench.

Yogita W/O Sachin Hule @ Yogita Balu… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

11-WP.10261.2022+9

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 10261 OF 2022

¶4

Tai Rangrav Gejabe and Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶5

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10262 OF 2022 Swati Maruti Sale and Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶6

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10264 OF 2022 Sunita Rajaram Mane and Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶7

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10265 OF 2022

¶8

Kshitija d/o Baban Shinde } and Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶9

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10268 OF 2022

¶10

Jaya Yashwant Bhoye and Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶11

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10270 OF 2022

¶12

Komal Mahadev Kajale and Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

Page 1 of 3

J.V.Salunke,PS

11-WP.10261.2022+9

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10400 OF 2022

¶17

Suvarna Bhimanand Magade } @ Suvarna Sachin Kharat } Petitioner Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶18

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13642 OF 2022

¶19

Dnyaneshwari Vitthal Bhoye } and Ors. } Petitioners

¶20

Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶21

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10266 OF 2022

¶22

Yogita w/o. Sachin Hule } @ Yogita Balu Adavale and Ors. } Petitioners

¶23

Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶24

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10269 OF 2022

¶25

Prema Hanumant Deshmukh } and Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents

¶26

Mr. Pramod A. Kulkarni for the petitioners in all writ petitions.

¶27

Mr. Rui Rodrigues with Ms. Gargi Warunjikar for respondent no. 1 in all writ petitions.

¶28

Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for State in all writ petitions.

¶29

CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. & ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 2022

Page 2 of 3

J.V.Salunke,PS

11-WP.10261.2022+9

P.C.:

1. The parties are ad-idem that all these writ petitions can be disposed of in the light of the order dated 20^th June 2022 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court at Aurangabad Bench on a bunch of writ petitions with Writ Petition No. 2461 of 2022 ( Chetan Pramod Gangele vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ) being the lead matter.

¶35

2. In such view of the matter, no other order is required to be passed on this bunch of writ petitions except that the petitioners shall be entitled to similar benefits as the petitioners before the Aurangabad Bench.

¶36

3. The writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

¶37

SALUNKE J V

¶38

Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2022.11.25 17:10:19 +0530

¶39

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶40

Page 3 of 3

¶41

J.V.Salunke,PS

Yogita W/O Sachin Hule @ Yogita Balu Adavale and Ors. v. the Union of India Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogita W/O Sachin Hule @ Yogita Balu Adavale and Ors. v. the Union of India Thr. Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gousmahamad Ibrahim Bagir Vs the Chief Officer Ichalkarani Municipal Council and Ors.

Pune District Co-Operative Housing Societis, and Apt. Federation Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept.

Gousmahamad Ibrahim Bagir Vs the Chief Officer Ichalkarani Municipal Council and Ors.

Swati Maruti Sale and Ors. Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.

Tai Rangrav Gejabe and Ors. Vs the Union of India Thr. Its Secretary and Ors.

Kshitija D/O Baban Shinde and Ors. Vs the Union of India Thr. Secretary Ministry and Ors.