The court disposed of Testamentary Suit No. 40 of 2006 based on consent terms filed by the parties and their advocates, marking the terms as evidence and recovering any court fees.
Testamentary Suit No. 40 of 2006 was disposed of in terms of the consent terms filed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MUGDHA M PARANJAPE
Digitally signed by MUGDHA M PARANJAPE Date: 2022.12.22 18:41:34 +0530
1 903-TS 40-06.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.40 OF 2006
Shailesh Umakant Shukla … Plaintiff
Vs. Indradeo Harihar Shukla, Since deceased through his LRs 1a)Vinay Indradeo Shukla & Anr. … Defendants
Mr. D. R. Mishra for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the Defendants.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 22ND DECEMBER 2022
P.C. :
Mugdha
1 of 5
2 903-TS 40-06.doc
identification. For ease of reference, said consent terms are scanned and reproduced as under :-
Mugdha
2 of 5
3 903-TS 40-06.doc
Mugdha
3 of 5
4 903-TS 40-06.doc
Mugdha
4 of 5
5 903-TS 40-06.doc
the consent terms.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
5 of 5
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
