Officer on Special Duty in Testamentary Department recorded instructions to the petitioner's counsel to rectify a draft Judge's order by incorporating corrections regarding property details and adding the purchaser's name before re-submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Before : P. A. Jagdale,
Officer on Special Duty,
With Testamentary Department
Date :- 18th August, 2023
FOR APPROVAL OF DRAFT OF JUDGE’S ORDER:
11. TP/210/2022 P. C. :Shri. Saurabh Oka Advocate for the Petitioner
1. Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted
draft of the Judge’s order along with affidavit
of the petitioner affirmed on 17.04.2023 along
with copy of the grant issued on 09.11.2022,
memorandum of Understanding, consent
affidavit of Nirija.
2. There are some corrections in a draft of the
Judge’s order regarding property and holder of
the property. Furthermore, draft does not
contained name of the purchaser. Hence,
petitioner to rectify the draft and submit it.
Hence, adjourned.
3. S. O. to 25.08.2023
18.08.2023 Officer on Special Duty,
with Testamentary Department
P. A. Jagdale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court