The plaintiff counsel stated the dispute was settled out of court, leading the court to dispose of the suit as withdrawn and the summons for judgment accordingly.
Suit disposed as withdrawn; Summons for Judgment disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.38 OF 2019
IN
COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.729 OF 2018
Smith Realtors & Anr. .. Plaintiffs
v/s.
S.S. Enterprises & Ors. .. Defendants
Mr. Viral Thakur i/b. Mahesh Thaker for the plaintiffs. Ms. Fatema Tankiwala i/b. LJ Law for defendant nos.3 to 5.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J. DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2022.
P.C. :
(ii) On disposal of the Suit, Summons for Judgment does not survive. Summons for Judgment is also disposed.
(iii) Refund, if any, as per rules.
Digitally signed by SANDHYA SANDHYA BHAGU BHAGU WADHWA WADHWA Date: 2022.06.16 11:16:28 +0530
(A. K. MENON, J.) 1/1
10.sj-38-19.doc wadhwa
A. K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
