The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of Second Appeal No. 13 of 2020 as withdrawn after the appellant's counsel stated that parties had resolved their differences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33 SA 13 OF 2020.ODT
Esha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2020
SANTAN REBELLO., … APPELLANT VS MAGDALENA REBELLO AND 6 ORS., … RESPONDENTS
Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Jatin Ramaiya, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3.
CORAM: A.K. MENON, J.
DATED: 21st MARCH 2022
P.C.:
1. Mr. Menezes, learned Counsel for the appellant states that the parties have resolved their differences and he has instructions to withdraw this Appeal unconditionally. At his request, the Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. Civil Applications, if any,
stands disposed of.
Digitally signed by VAIGANKAR VAIGANKAR ESHA SAINATH ESHA SAINATH Date: 2022.03.21 19:06:42 +05'30'
Page 1 of 1 21st March 2022
SANTAN REBELLO
MAGDALENA REBELLO
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
