This review petition in PIL No. 64 of 2021 challenging an order against ONGC was dismissed because the court could not locate any error apparent on the face of the record.
The review petition stands dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-rpi-2-2022
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 2 OF 2022 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 64 OF 2021
Shaligram G. Mishra .. Petitioner
Vs.
M/s. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Sale i/by Consulta Juris for respondent no.2.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. &
M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2022
P.C.:
1. None appears for the review petitioner.
2. However, we have perused the order under review dated 13th December, 2021 passed in Public Interest Litigation No. 64 of 2021.
3. In the light of the averments made in the review petition, we have not been able to locate any error apparent on the face of the record warranting a review.
4. The review petition stands dismissed. No costs.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2022.12.05 20:48:42 +0530
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an error apparent on the face of the record exists to warrant a review of the order in PIL No. 64 of 2021.
Shaligram G. Mishra
M/s. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation & Ors.
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
