Petitioner in a Public Interest Litigation sought leave to withdraw their petition. The court granted leave for withdrawal and dismissed the PIL as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-aspil86-2022
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 86 OF 2022
Saji Iyakaramuruyil Pappachan …Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department & Ors. …Respondents
Ms. Kiran Sharma with Mr. Jigar Shah & Mr. Ronak Shah i/by Mr. Tarun S. Sharma for the petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Ms. Reena Salunkhe, AGP for respondent no.1/State.
Mr. Mayuresh S. Lagu for respondent no.2.
Mr. S. S. Bedekar for respondent no.3.
Mr. S. B. Shetye for respondent no.4.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE: JULY 20, 2022
P.C.:
1. Ms. Sharma, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the PIL petition.
2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted.
3. The PIL petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by ATUL ATUL GANESH KULKARNI GANESH Date: KULKARNI 2022.07.20 19:33:52 +0530
1
Saji Iyakaramuruyil Pappachan
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court