Disposed
Rahul Narayan Lathi v. State Government of Maharashtra through Revenue Secretary
Bombay HCPIL/56/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
56.19pil
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1014 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.56 OF 2019
MR. RAHUL NARAYAN LATHI
VERSUS STATE GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH REVENUE SECRETARY
…. Ms. Riya Jariwala, Advocate h/f Mr Rahul Totala, Advocate for petitioner; Mr S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for respondent/State
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 12th October, 2022
PER COURT:
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
Mr. Rahul Narayan Lathi
State Government of Maharashtra, Through Revenue Secretary
Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court