Disposed

Ajij Abbas Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Jul 2022PIL/32/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a PIL where the petitioner's representations regarding land allotment for a Kabrasthan were pending. The Court directed the petitioner to submit documents within one week and fixed a deadline of 10th August 2022 for the respondent to decide.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to submit documents within one week; Respondent to decide by 10th August 2022; Liberty to apply if no order passed by that date.

Ajij Abbas Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶2

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 32 OF 2021

¶4

Ajij Abbas Pathan … Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents

¶5

Mr. Vikram S. Undre for the Petitioner.

¶6

Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w. Smt. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the State – Respondent no. 1.

¶7

Mr. Sandeep V. Marne for Respondent no. 2.

¶8

Mr. M. L. Patil for Respondent no. 2.

¶9

CORAM : A. K. MENON , J. & M.S. KARNIK , J. DATED : 4th JULY, 2022

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that representations made by the petitioner are pending decision. His representations are dated 6 th January, 2021 and 1st April, 2021. The representations pertain to allotment of land for a Kabrasthan.

¶12

Mr. Marne learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2 states that the representations will be decided within a period of 4 weeks from today. On behalf of the petitioner a request is made that certain documents that he has in possession may be considered prior to taking a decision. He has

¶13

28-PIL-32-2021.odt rrpillai

¶14

relied upon documents at Exhibit G to the petition and submitted that this and additional documents he wishes to file may be considered by respondent no.

¶15

2 before taking a decision. Accordingly, we pass the following order :

¶16

(i) Petitioner shall submit to respondent no. 2 such documents that he has

¶17

in possession and power and which pertain to the issue at hand within one week from today.

¶18

(ii) Respondent no. 2 shall decide the pending representations including the contents of the additional documents that may be filed on or before

¶19

10th August, 2022.

¶20

(iii) If no documents are filed within one week, the existing representations

¶21

will be decided on its own merits and a reasoned order will be passed.

¶22

(iv) Petition disposed in the above terms.

¶23

(v) Liberty to apply if no order is passed on or before 10th August, 2022.

¶24

(M. S. KARNIK, J.)

¶25

(A. K. MENON, J.)

¶26

2/2

¶27

28-PIL-32-2021.odt rrpillai

Ajij Abbas Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajij Abbas Pathan v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tanaji Ashok Patil and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Rural Development Dept and Ors.

Thane District Co-Opertative Housing Federation Ltd. and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Secretary Revenu and Forest Dept.

Tanaji Ashok Patil and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Rural Development Dept and Ors.

Consumer Courts Advocates Association vs State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Asha Rajendra Jangam Alias Asha Uttamrao Aglave and Others Vs the Union of India and Others

Manohar Ramrao Gaikwad Vs Honble Minister State Excise Department Mumbai and Others

Nagarjun Wadekar Vs the Union of India Thr. Secretary Ministry of Education (Hrd) and Ors.

Shailesh Gandhi and 5 Ors. vs Maharashtra State Information Commission

Save Education Committee Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Rajiv Bhagelu Gupta Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Moonline Express Cargo Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Union of India