The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the present Public Interest Litigation. The Court disposed of the PIL as withdrawn with no costs awarded.
PIL disposed of as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 175 OF 2022
Anandrao Maruti Pachatake .Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & ors. .Respondents
Mr. Datta H. Pawar, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP, for the Respondents – State
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ. AND S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATE : 12 DECEMBER 2022
P. C.
. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the present Public Interest Litigation.
withdrawn. No costs.
( S. G. Chapalgaonkar, J. ) ( S. V. Gangapurwala, ACJ. )
Anandrao Maruti Pachatake
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. G. Chapalgaonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
