This order allowed the applicant's miscellaneous civil application regarding the custody of two minor sons, noting her custodial role and potential hardship since the rival party did not appear.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) for the custody of two minor sons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(14)-MCA-86-21.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJIGOVINDRAO GOVINDRAOPANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2022.01.11 16:31:03 +0530
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2021
Sou. Aparna Sagar Gade ..Applicant
Versus
Shri. Sagar Subhash Gade ..Respondent
Mr. Veerdhaval Kakade, for the Applicant.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 11th JANUARY, 2022
P.C.
1. Though served none appears for the non-applicant.
2. As such, contents in the application went
uncontroverted. Applicant is informed to be custodian of two minor
sons. As such, she is likely to suffer comparatively more hardship
both financially and physically.
3. That being so, application is allowed in terms of prayer
clause (a).
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
1 o f 1
BGP.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for custody of two minor sons should be allowed in favour of the non-applicant.
Sou. Aparna Sagar Gade
Shri. Sagar Subhash Gade
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court