Disposed
Vrushali Sham Kame v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCIA/644/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-IA644-22INABA2541-2021.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 644 OF 2022 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2541 OF 2021
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2022.07.05 10:57:23 +0530
Vrushali Sham Kame, ...Intervener In the matter between Rohit Umesh Sathe ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. R. S. Sawant, for the Intervener.
Mr. Nitesh Mohite, i/b Sachin Zalte, for the Applicant. Mrs. M. R. Tidke, APP for the State.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 4th JULY, 2022
PC:-
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant.
informant.
The application stands allowed.
party respondent no.2.
Necessary amendment in ABA/2541/2022 be carried out
forthwith.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Santosh Subhash Kulkarni
Rohit Umesh Sathe
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court