Disposed

Vasant Raghunath Holkar and Anr. v. Priya Sameer Holkar

Bombay HC15 Dec 2022IA/4563/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted an interim order in a writ petition challenging an administrative decision. The Court appointed Advocate Aditya Shiralkar as a mediator and ordered unsuccessful mediation parties to approach him with a hearing schedule. Final hearing was fixed for 12/01/2023.

What did the court decide?

Appointed Mr. Aditya Shiralkar as mediator, ordered parties to fix schedule and share costs; final hearing fixed for 12/01/2023 if mediation fails.

Vasant Raghunath Holkar and Anr. Vs Priya Sameer… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1 14-IA 4563-22 in WP 1736-19.doc

¶2

Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA M M PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2022.12.16 11:41:14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4563 OF 2022

¶3

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1736 OF 2019

¶5

Vasant Raghunath Holkar & Anr. … Applicants In the matter of Priya Sameer Holkar … Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Deputy Collector (GAD), Mumbai City, Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents

¶8

Ms. Trupti A. Bharadi for the Applicants.

¶9

Mr. M. A. Sayed, AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶10

Mr. Uday Bobade i/by Adity Andhorikar for Respondent in IA No.4563/2022.

¶11

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2022

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

The present Interim Application seeks a prayer of expeditious

¶14

hearing and disposal of Writ Petition No.1736/2019.

¶15

The challenge in the Writ Petition is to an order dated 09/03/2018 passed by Respondent No.1-The Deputy Collector (GAD), Mumbai City, Mumbai.

¶16

Mugdha

¶17

1 of 3

¶18

2 14-IA 4563-22 in WP 1736-19.doc

¶19

The Petitioner is the daughter-in-law of Respondent Nos.2 and 3. It seems that the dispute is amongst the family members. It is suggested to the respective Counsel as to whether their respective clients would be agreeable to explore the possibility of resolving this dispute by mediation, both of them fairly agreed for the same.

¶20

Mr. Aditya Shiralkar, who is a practicing advocate in this Hon’ble Court, was present in the Court when the matter was called out. The Court requested him if he would be able to act as a Mediator in this matter. He expressed his ability to do so. Both the sides have no objection to his appointment as a Mediator. Thus, Mr. Aditya Shiralkar is appointed to act as a Mediator in this matter. The details of Mr. Aditya Shiralkar are as follows :-

¶21

Mr. Aditya Shiralkar

¶22

1102, Ram Nimi Fort, 12-12 C, Cawasji Patel Street, Fort, Mumbai 400 001. E-mail ID – [email protected] Mobile No.: +91-9920040804

¶23

On a copy of this order being uploaded, both the Counsel shall jointly approach learned mediator Mr. Aditya Shiralkar and fix a schedule for mediation and supply him with all necessary documents that are required. The costs of mediation shall be shared equally by both the parties.

¶24

Mugdha

¶25

2 of 3

¶26

3 14-IA 4563-22 in WP 1736-19.doc

¶27

The Writ Petition shall be fixed for final hearing on 12/01/2023, in the event the mediation fails.

¶28

In view of the above, the Interim Application is disposed of

accordingly.

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

Mugdha

3 of 3

Vasant Raghunath Holkar and Anr. v. Priya Sameer Holkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasant Raghunath Holkar and Anr. v. Priya Sameer Holkar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakhimchand Doulatram Matreja Vs Hassan Doulatram Matreja (Deceased)

Dinesh Ramji Patel Vs Jija Ramji Patel (Deceased)

Prema Nair w/o R K Narayan Vs Devaki Amma W/O Madhavan (Deceased)

Mulund Raviraj Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs Rupji Constructions a (Partnership Firm) and 2 Ors.

Annadurai Palani Swami Devendra vs the State of Maharashtra and 12 Oher

Leelavathi Sitaram Purusha Vs Sitaram Narayan Purusha (Deceased)