Allowed
Vanita Yashwant Kangutkar and Ors. v. Subhash Pandurang Nakhawa
Bombay HCIA/3745/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Arjun
38-IA-3745-2022.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3745 OF 2022 IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 22462 OF 2019
Vanita Yashwant Kangutkar & Ors. …Applicants In the matter between Vanita Yashwant Kangutkar & Ors. …Petitioners V/s. Subhash Pandurang Nakhawa …Respondent
Mr. S. M. Railkar, for the Applicants.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 19th July, 2022
P.C. :
Applicants. For the reasons set out in the Interim Application the same
is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
Vanita Yashwant Kangutkar & Ors.
Subhash Pandurang Nakhawa
MADHAV J. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court