Dismissed

M/S Better Casting (a Partnership Firm) and Anr. v. Mr. Narayansingh Jogsingh Solanki Proprietor of M/S Prayas Steel and Alloys

Bombay HC17 Oct 2022IA/363/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First Appeal dismissed based on consent terms settled by parties. Court recorded consent, declared decree satisfied, required refund of court fees, and retained hard copy of terms.

What did the court decide?

First Appeal disposed of with order in terms of Consent Terms; Court fees refunded decree marked satisfied.

What the court decided

M/S Better Casting (a Partnership Firm) and… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

7-FA-52-2022+.DOC

¶2

Ashwini

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION COMMERCIAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2022

¶4

¶5

SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 169 OF 2019

¶6

¶7

COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 697 OF 2021 WITH

¶8

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2022

¶9

¶10

SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 169 OF 2019

¶11

¶12

COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 697 OF 2021

¶13

Better Casting (A Partnership Firm) & Ors …Appellants Versus Narayansingh Jogsingh Solanki Proprietor of …Respondent Prayas Steel and Alloys

¶14

ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH

¶15

Digitally signed by ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Date: 2022.10.19 13:02:48 +0530

¶16

Mr Om Prakash Singh , for the Appellant. Mr DR Dhiwar , for the Respondent.

¶17

CORAM G.S. Patel & Gauri Godse, JJ. DATED: 17th October 2022

¶18

PC:-

¶19

Page 1 of 3 17th October 2022

¶20

7-FA-52-2022+.DOC

¶21

1. The parties have settled their disputes. Consent Terms are tendered in the First Appeal. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “ X1 ” for identification with today’s date. These are signed by the Constituted Attorney of the Appellant and by the Respondent. Both signatories are present in Court. They are also signed by the Advocates for the parties.

¶22

2. We are satisfied that the Consent Terms are in order, not contrary to law and have been drawn by the parties of their own volition in reflection of their true intentions.

¶23

3. The undertakings, if any, in the Consent Terms being accepted as undertakings to the Court.

¶24

4. The Appeal is disposed of with an order in terms of the Consent Terms.

¶25

5. A soft copy of the Consent Terms will be uploaded as the second order in the matter.

¶26

6. The Demand Draft referred to in Clause (ii) of the Consent Terms have been handed over to the Defendants.

¶27

7. Counsel before us agree that Clause (4) of the Consent Terms which seeks that the decree dated 16th September 2021 be set aside is erroneously worded. The decree stands, but it will be marked fully satisfied in accordance with the Consent Terms.

Page 2 of 3

17th October 2022

7-FA-52-2022+.DOC

8. The Registry is to ensure that the hard copy of the signed Consent Terms is permanently retained on file as part of the record and is not sent for destruction in the ordinary course.

¶32

9. Court fees are to be refunded in accordance with the Rules. For the purposes of Section 43 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act and the proviso to that Section, today’s date is the date of making a claim for repayment. The Registrar ( Judicial) will issue a certificate for a refund of Court Fees computed according to the Rules. He will act on production of an authenticated copy of this order without requiring a separate application.

¶33

10. The vakalatnama of Mr Dhiwar for the Respondent is to be filed within a week.

¶34

(Gauri Godse, J)

¶35

Page 3 of 3 17th October 2022

M/S Better Casting (a Partnership Firm) and Anr. v. Mr. Narayansingh Jogsingh Solanki Proprietor of M/S Prayas Steel and Alloys

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

M/S Better Casting (a Partnership Firm) and Anr. v. Mr. Narayansingh Jogsingh Solanki Proprietor of M/S Prayas Steel and Alloys

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashutosh S/o Shivkumar Sharma Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.

Pooja Balasaheb Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. C.B. Enterprises, Thr. Its Prop. Mr. Sushil Bramhadin Mishra Vs Anupama B.Shah,Prop. of M/S. Anupam Developers Thr. Her Constitued Attonery,Mr. Surendra Singh Sola

Bhagwandas Gupta and Anr. Vs Relcon Infraprojects Limited and 5 Ors.

M/S Better Casting (a Partnership Firm) and Anr. Vs Mr. Narayansingh Jogsingh Solanki Proprietor of M/S Prayas Steel and Alloys

Kunal Mahesh Bhalinge Vs Mahesh Bhalinge S/O. Manik Bhalinge (Deceased)