The High Court dismissed the first appeal and interim application based on a consent settlement arrived at by the parties, ordering the drawing of a consistent decree.
First appeal and interim application disposed of; decree drawn per consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-FAST-99031-2020.DOC
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE
Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE
Date: 2022.02.22 00:09:13 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 99031 OF 2020
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2021
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 99031 OF 2020
M/s.Shantinath Enterprises ...Appellant
Versus
Muzamil A. Majid Patel and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Ganesh Bhujbal for the Appellant. Mr.Prasad Kulkarni for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo a/w. Mr. Pushkar Nagpurkar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: V.G.BISHT, J. DATE: 21st February, 2022
PC:-
1. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that the
parties have settled the matter amicably and they have arrived at Consent Terms. Both the parties are present in the Court. Learned counsel has produced the Consent Terms dated 21st February, 2022. The parties along with their respective counsel signed the said consent terms, which are accepted and marked as Exhibit A. The
Trupti
1/2
5-FAST-99031-2020.DOC
undertakings given in the Consent Terms by the parties are accepted.
Trupti
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the first appeal and interim application should be disposed of in light of a consent settlement.
Whether a decree for consent terms should be drawn.
M/s.Shantinath Enterprises
Muzamil A. Majid Patel and Ors.
V.G. Bisht
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
