The Court allowed an oral prayer for amendment to the petition to include the charge-sheet and raise additional grounds for quashing the FIR, directing the applicant to file amendments and serve the amended copy within one week.
Oral prayer for amendment to the petition allowed; necessary amendments to be carried out within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P5.IA.2482.2021 in WP.3620.21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed by AARTI AARTI G G PALKARDate: PALKAR 2022.02.1715:28:49 +0530
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2482 OF 2021 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3620 OF 2021
Rajneesh Mathur ….Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ….Respondents
Mr. Abhishek Bhandari i/b. Goenka Law Associates for the Applicant. Mr. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & SURENDRA P. TAVADE, JJ.
DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2022.
P.C. :
AGP 1/2
P5.IA.2482.2021 in WP.3620.21.doc
as well as raising additional grounds and consequential prayers in the petition. When a specifc query was put to the learned counsel for the applicant, whether any interim order is passed in the petition, the learned counsel submitted that no interim order is passed in the petition. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, oral prayer for amendment is allowed. Necessary amendments to be carried out within one week from today. Needless to state that an amended copy of the petition be served on the other side. A copy of charge-sheet and certain other material is a form of report of internal committee.
( SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.)
(PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
AGP 2/2
Rajneesh Mathur
The State of Maharashtra
Prasnna B. Varale
Surendra P. Tavade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
