Allowed

Sanjeev Indurao Desai and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC17 Nov 2022IA/2455/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lean order allowing interim applications 2455 and 2454 of 2022 filed in Criminal Writ Petitions 4566 and 4658 of 2019. The court ordered amendments to be carried within two weeks, issued notice, and set the matter for hearing on December 21, 2022.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; amendments to be made within two weeks; notice issued; stand over to 21st December 2022.

Sanjeev Indurao Desai and Ors. Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

32-IA.2455.2022 & IA.2454.2022.doc

¶2

SSA

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2455 OF 2022

¶5

IN

¶6

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4566 OF 2019

¶7

Sanjeev Indurao Desai & Ors.
V/s.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

¶9

… Applicants

¶10

… Respondents

¶11

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2454 OF 2022 IN

¶12

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4658 OF 2019

¶13

 Adv. Chandrashekar Vitthal Gawade… Applicant
V/s.

¶14

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents

¶15

Mr. Sachin Gawade i/b Mr. Mahesh V. Rawool for Applicant/s.
Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for Respondent No.1 (State)
Mr. V. B. Tapkir for Respondent No.2

¶16

CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.

¶17

DATED:NOVEMBER 17, 2022

¶18

P.C.:

¶19

1.For the reasons stated in the Application is allowed.
The amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today.
2.Issue notice to newly added respondents, notice to
legal representatives on behalf of respondent no.2, returnable on
21st December, 2022.

¶20

3.Stand over to 21st December, 2022.

¶21

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶22

Sanjeev Indurao Desai and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Indurao Desai and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Z. Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S Regency Corporation through Kartik P Vasani and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

M/S Regency Corporation through Kartik P Vasani and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kedar Pandurang Chaudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kishor Narkhede and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Adv. Chandrashekhar Vitthal Gawade Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.