In Criminal Revision Application No. 187 of 2022, the Court dismissed the applicant's prayer for reducing the deposit amount of Rs.3,00,000/- but extended the time for deposit by an additional six weeks.
Extension of six weeks to deposit the amount of Rs.3,00,000/-; refusal to reduce the deposit amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39--ia-1911-2022-in-REVN-187-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1911 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 187 OF 2022
Raju Sitaram Landge ...Applicant
Versus
M/s. Sheeba Finance And Kuries Ltd And Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Parag V. Dube, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE: 27th JUNE, 2022.
PER COURT:
1.This is an application for reduction of the amount stipulated
in order dated 6th May, 2022 and extension of time to deposit the
amount of Rs.3,00,000/- in accordance with the said order.
Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that on account of
financial constraints, the applicant could not deposit the amount of
Rs.3,00,000/-. The amount may be reduced and time may be
granted to deposit the said amount.
2.Vide order dated 6th May, 2022, the applicant was granted six
weeks time to deposit the amount of Rs.3,00,000/-. The prayer for
reduction cannot be granted. Sufficient time was granted to
deposit the amount, however, considering the submissions, time to
deposit the said amount is extended by a period of six weeks.
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALILIYAKAT LIYAKATJAMADARDate: JAMADAR 2022.06.29 10:30:06 +0530
1 of 2
Sajakali Jamadar
39--ia-1911-2022-in-REVN-187-2022.doc
3. Interim Application No. 1911 of 2022 is disposed of accordingly.
4. Ad-interim relief granted earlier in Revision Application No.187 of 2022 shall continue.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
2 of 2
Sajakali Jamadar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for reduction of the deposit amount and extension of time was entitled to be granted.
Whether sufficient time granted previously warranted further extension.
Raju Sitaram Landge
M/s. Sheeba Finance And Kuries Ltd And Anr.
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court