In this interim application, the applicant sought recall of a conditional order based on a settlement. The court ordered the return of the bank guarantee and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Bank guarantee furnished by the applicant be returned to the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-ia159-2020 in appw428-2013.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.159 OF 2020
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.428 OF 2013
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.445 OF 2010
Shivneri Nagri Sahakari
Pat Sanstha Maryadit…Applicant
V/s.
Abhinandan Babasahen Khot & Anr.…Respondents
Digitally signed byATUL ATUL GANESH GANESH KULKARNI KULKARNI Date: 2022.11.24 11:46:46 +0530
Mr. Rahul Walvekar for the applicant.
Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for respondent no.2/State.
CORAM :AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:NOVEMBER 22, 2022
P.C.:
1.Learned advocate for the applicant has filed a praecipe for
recall of the conditional order in Criminal Application No.428 of
2013. It is stated that the parties have settled the dispute.
2. In that view of the matter, the bank guarantee furnished by the applicant be returned to the applicant.
3. The interim application is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to recall a conditional order in an interim criminal application upon a statement of settlement.
Shivneri Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit
Abhinandan Babasahen Khot
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court