Allowed
Asha W/O. Sainath Sarale and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCIA/1369/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spm 1 16-IA-1369-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1369 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2022
Asha W/o. Sainath Sarale and Anr. …..Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
…..Respondents
Ms. Anjali Patil for Applicants.
Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Sushil Inamdar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.
DATE : 11th JULY, 2022.
P.C.:-
In pursuance of Order dated 20th June, 2022, the High Court
Legal Services Committee, Mumbai has appointed Advocate Mr. Sushil A.
Inamdar to represent Respondent No.2.
2.The maximum sentence imposed upon the Applicant in the
present case is six months of simple imprisonment. Possibility of hearing
present Appeal on its own merits in near future is remote.
3.In view thereof, during the pendency of present Appeal, interim
relief granted by Order dated 29th April, 2022 is hereby confirmed.
4. Interim Application is accordingly allowed.
1/1
Asha W/o. Sainath Sarale
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court