Allowed

Yogesh Subhash Mulye and Anr. (Applicant) v. Subhash Keshav Mulye and Anr. (Petitioners) and Hemangi Ravindra Mulye (Deceased)

Bombay HC9 Dec 2022IA/1185/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the Interim Application condoning a delay of 1242 days and impleading new legal heirs. The court permitted the amendment of the Testamentary Petition and Schedule-I to include the son and daughter of the original Petitioner, recognizing their entitlement under the Hindu Succession Act.

What did the court decide?

Condoned the delay of 1242 days and allowed the Interim Application to amend the Testamentary Petition and Schedule-I.

Yogesh Subhash Mulye and Anr. (Applicant) Vs… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1 25-IA 1185-22 in NMT 72-19.doc

¶2

Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA M M PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2022.12.10 11:41:29 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1185 OF 2022

¶4

¶5

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.72 OF 2019 IN

¶6

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.1555 OF 2015

¶7

Yogesh Subhash Mulye & Anr. … Applicants In the matter between Hemangi Ravindra Mulye … Deceased Subhash Keshav Mulye & Anr. … Petitioners -----

¶8

Ms. T. J. Kapre for the Applicants.

¶9

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 09TH DECEMBER 2022

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

The present Interim Application seeks an amendment to ScheduleI of the Testamentary Petition No.1555 of 2015. The Applicants herein are the legal heirs (son and daughter) of the original Petitioner No.1, viz., Subhash Keshav Mulye. The Applicants are also the nephew and niece respectively of Smt. Hemangi Ravindra Mulye. The Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking Letters of Administration to the property and credits belonging to Late Smt. Hemangi Ravindra Mulye. Petitioner No.1 has expired on 11/06/2018. The Applicants are seeking to be impleaded in place and stead of the original

¶12

Mugdha

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

2 25-IA 1185-22 in NMT 72-19.doc

¶15

Petitioner No.1, as they being son and daughter of Petitioner No.1 as also nephew and niece of the deceased, viz., Hemangi Ravindra Mulye, as per the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and thus entitled to file the present Interim Application.

¶16

There is a delay of 1242 days in filing of the present Interim Application. The Applicants, in Paragraph 13 of the Interim Application, have explained the reasons for the delay. I am satisfied that the delay in this case ought to be condoned in the interest of justice and that the Interim Application ought to be allowed. The Interim Application is therefore made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b), which read thus :-

¶17

“a. That the delay in filing the interim application of 1242 days be condoned.

¶18

b. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow the Applicant/Petitioner to amend the Petition and also Schedule-I as per Schedule annexed hereto.”

¶19

The Interim Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶21

Mugdha

¶22

2 of 2

Yogesh Subhash Mulye and Anr. (Applicant) v. Subhash Keshav Mulye and Anr. (Petitioners) and Hemangi Ravindra Mulye (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Subhash Mulye and Anr. (Applicant) v. Subhash Keshav Mulye and Anr. (Petitioners) and Hemangi Ravindra Mulye (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Bandu Jadyal vs the State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors.

Santosh Vittal Shetty and 3 Others vs Akshar Properties and Another

Ambrish H. Soni vs Chetan Narendra Dhakan

Nirav Vinod Shah and Anr. Vs Vinod Lakshmshi Shah - Deceased

Aruna Dharamshi Rambhia Vs Dharamshi Kanji Rambhia (Deceased)

Prathibha Ramasubramanian D/O Ramasubramanian Lakshmanier Vs L.Ramasubramanian Alias Ramasubramanian Lakshmanier (Deceased)