Disposed

State of Mah and Anr. v. Maruti Potanna Hatnure

Bombay HC12 Mar 2022FA/216/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeals filed by the State before the National Lok Adalat were disposed of as withdrawn by the Appellants-State based on a Government Resolution policy. Directions were issued for depositing compensation in reference courts if not previously deposited.

What did the court decide?

First appeals disposed of as withdrawn; compensation to be deposited in reference court within six months if not already deposited.

State of Mah and Anr. Vs Maruti Potanna Hatnure — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

-1-

¶2

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, HELD ON 12^TH MARCH, 2022.

¶3

AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD

¶4

76 FIRST APPEAL NO.3271 OF 2008

¶5

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS KERBA SAMBHAJI JADHAV

¶6

Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Appellant State Mr. M.V. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.1/1 to 1/3

¶7

Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No.2

¶8

77 FIRST APPEAL NO.216 OF 2009

¶9

STATE OF MAH and ANR VERSUS

¶10

MARUTI POTANNA HATNURE

¶11

Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Appellant State Mr. S. v. Kurundkar, Advocate for Respondent

¶12

78 FIRST APPEAL NO.1663 OF 2009

¶13

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS

¶14

DIGAMBER IRBAJI BUTLE

¶15

Mr. A. M. Phule, A.G.P. for the Appellant/State Mr. Prakash Assna Satelikar, S.D.O. Urdhwa Pengaga Project, Division No.8, Nanded.

¶16

Mr. G. N. Chincholkar, Advocate for Respondent

¶17

79 FIRST APPEAL NO.1754 OF 2009

¶18

WITH FA/1755/2009 WITH FA/1756/2009

¶19

-2-

¶20

WITH FA/1757/2009

¶21

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS MALLIKARJUN BABURAO EKALARE

¶22

… AGP for Appellant/s: Mr. A. M. Phule Mr. Vikas Rajaram Mane, S.D.O. Nanded

¶23

These appeals are placed before the Lok-Adalat by the Appellants-State.

¶24

Mr. A. M. Phule, learned A.G.P. for the Appellants/State submitted that the above numbered group of appeals are squarely covered by the Government Resolution No. Sankirna2014/pra.kra.41/Bhag-1/A-4 dated 3^rd November, 2016 along with subsequent Corrigendum dated 23^rd February, 2017 and 13^th August 2018 to the said Government Resolution. In turn, this group of appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, the State is withdrawing these appeals.

¶25

Mr. A. M. Phule, learned AGP for Appellants/State on instructions submits that, if the amount of compensation is not deposited before this Court or before the Reference Court then the same shall be deposited in reference Court, within a period of six months from receipt of this order. After depositing said amount in reference Court, the claimants are entitled to

¶26

-3-

¶27

withdraw the same. It is further clarifed that, in case, any amount is lying with this Court, then the same shall be transmitted to the reference Court. The reference Court shall disburse said amount to the original claimants on their applications. The claimants are at liberty to make appropriate application before the reference Court and withdraw the said amount.

¶28

In view of the above, the First Appeals stands disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶29

Civil Application/s, if any, stands disposed of.

¶30

The Court fee refund certifcate be issued as per the provisions under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959.

¶31

[S.P.BRAHME] [S.G.SHETE] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,J.] Advocate D.J.(Retd.) Head of the Panel Member

¶32

Date: 12-03-2022. Place: Aurangabad. Yogesh/

State of Mah and Anr. v. Maruti Potanna Hatnure

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of Mah and Anr. v. Maruti Potanna Hatnure

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhondabai Rama Solunke vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Atmarao Kondiba Gadekar vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Suresh Ramrao Savane (Died) Thr Lrs Sharda Suresh Savane vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Collector, Jalna and Ors.

Devibharti Jankiram Kadam and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Thr Its Legal Manager Vs Aashabai Ashok Sarode and Others

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Branch Manager, Aurangabad Vs Kamal Gangaprasad Kharode and Ors.