Disposed
Smt. Mandakini Krishnakant Kerle v. Rajendra Purshottam Rasane
Bombay HCCRA/248/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
24.CRA.248.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.248 OF 2021
Smt. Mandakini Krishnakant Kerle ....Applicant Versus Rajendra Purshottam Rasane ....Respondent
Mr. Tejas D. Deshmukh a/w Mr. H. D. Chavan for the Applicant. Ms. Simran J. i/b. Adv. Sudhir V. Sadavarte for the Respondent.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATED : 22nd AUGUST, 2022
P.C.:
Court is already handed over to the respondent on 20/08/2022.
be accepted. As such, the statement is accepted and the revision application stands disposed of.
ANANTKRISHNANAIK Digitally signed byANANT KRISHNANAIKDate: 2022.08.2218:51:15 +0530
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
1/1
akn
Smt. Mandakini Krishnakant Kerle
Rajendra Purshottam Rasane
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court