A civil revision application seeking leave to withdraw the revision due to the disposition of the underlying suit via a consent decree was disposed of as withdrawn on the grounds that the suit itself was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24 CRA 3 OF 2017.ODT
Esha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2017
ARJUN VASUDEV NAIK AND ANR.,
VS … APPLICANTS
SATERI DEVASTHAN MOULA, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, RAVINDRA G. NAIK PEDNEKAR AND 8 ORS., … RESPONDENTS
Mr. Ketan Morajkar, Advocate for the Applicants.
CORAM: SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.
DATED: 28 JUNE 2022
P.C:
1. Learned Counsel for the Applicants seeks leave to withdraw the Revision since the suit itself is disposed of in view of the consent decree dated 17.01.2022, copy of which is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
2. Civil Revision Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.
VAIGANKAR Digitally signed by VAIGANKAR ESHA SAINATH ESHA SAINATH Date: 2022.06.28 17:59:02 +05'30'
Page 1 of 1 28 June 2022
ARJUN VASUDEV NAIK AND ANR.
SATERI DEVASTHAN MOULA
SANDEEP K. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
