The High Court at Bombay, in contempt petition No. 153 of 2019, granted leave to withdraw a petition by the parties. The petition was disputed was then dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SWAROOPSHARAD Digitally signedby SWAROOPSHARAD PHADKE PHADKE Date: 2022.07.2215:20:24 +0530
40 CPCD 153 OF 2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.153 OF 2019
IN
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.80 OF 2018 IN
COMM. SUMMARY SUIT NO.638 OF 2018
Bharat Bhatt and Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus
Rainbow Constructions and Ors.
...
Respondents
Ms. Vibuti Keny with Mr. Nayan P. i/by Converse Law LLP, for Petitioners.
None for Respondents.
CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.
DATE: 20th JULY, 2022
P.C.:
1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw the Petition as the parties have amicably resolved the disputes.2. Leave granted.
3. The Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )
SSP 1/1
Bharat Bhatt and Anr.
Rainbow Constructions and Ors.
N.J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court