The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a contempt petition after counsel submitted that the release of payment to the petitioners had occurred, thereby purging the contempt and complying with the prior order.
Contempt stands purged and the contempt petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp 321.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 321 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3891 OF 2020
Kamal Gangadhar Chikale and others .. Petitioners
Versus
Ajit Kumbhar, Chief Executive Officer and others .. Respondents
Shri Sambhaji G. Munde, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri A. R. Tapse, Advocate h/f Shri P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 11TH JANUARY, 2022.
FINAL ORDER :
. The learned counsel for petitioners on instructions of the petitioners submits that, the payment has been released to the petitioners.
[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Jan.22
Kamal Gangadhar Chikale and others
Ajit Kumbhar, Chief Executive Officer and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
