This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2709caw667.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.667 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3054 OF 2018
(Abdul Hamid s/o Usman Saheb Loni vs. Nagpur Improvement Trust and another)
________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri A.P. Raghute, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri G.A. Kunte, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Ms. N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for
respondent no.2.
CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
G.A. SANAP, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2022
Shri Kunte, learned Counsel for the
respondent no.1, submits that now it is an admitted
fact that the respondent no.1 Nagpur Improvement
Trust is the Planning Authority.
2)If this is so, this application is redundant
and, therefore, same is disposed of accordingly.
3)Stand over to four weeks.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Digitally Signed By:KAMAL HUNDRAJ JESWANI Signing Date:28.09.2022 12:27
Abdul Hamid s/o Usman Saheb Loni
Nagpur Improvement Trust
Another
Sunil B. Shukre
G.A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court